Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's score of 83.8. Although the iPhone XS Max and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s were released with only a couple of months difference, the iPhone XS Max construction is a bit thinner but also a little heavier. IPhone XS Max counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has lesser and slower cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has much more storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The iPhone XS Max has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a same size back-facing camera sensor, a 12 megapixels resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition, the iPhone XS Max also has better video frame rate. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.