Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, with a overall score of 83.8 against 80.3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is way newer than Google Nexus 6P's, but it is just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 5 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The Google Nexus 6P takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a higher 12.3 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Google Nexus 6P has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.