Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is just a bit thicker and extremely heavier than Google Pixel 2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a camera that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features improved battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.