Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-04-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Google Pixel XL, with a global score of 83.8 against 81.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the Google Pixel XL. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel XL has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Google Pixel XL features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 1 percent larger battery capacity. The Google Pixel XL has a camera that is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's camera, because although the Google Pixel XL has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a higher 12.3 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.