Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is way older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a higher display density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and OPPO Find X3 Pro count with very similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, faster video frame rate and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.