Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a global score of 84.7 against 83.8. The Galaxy A32 body is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's, but it is somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little faster processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A32 has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.