Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-04-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having a score of 83.8 against 81. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is newer, but thicker and a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little higher pixel number per inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.