Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-04-03 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having an 87.1 score against 83.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy Note9 is a just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier device than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a higher pixels density, a bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy Note9's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although the Galaxy Note9 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Note9 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy Note9 also has higher video frame rates and a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.