Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a noticeably older and a lot thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi made it lighter anyway. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a much larger display, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a just a little greater display pixels density. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.