Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 78.8. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is much older, a little heavier and a little thicker than vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit lower pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution. The vivo X60 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution, a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and faster video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro's memory capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.