Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-11-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having an 84.5 score against 83.8. The Apple iPhone XS Max is a just a bit thinner and a little lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, even though both were released with only 1 months difference. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS Max has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a quite greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a little larger screen, a bit more brightness and a little bit higher 1242 x 2688px resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same aperture, a 0.39 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. IPhone XS Max and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 count with quite similar battery performance, although the iPhone XS Max has just 3179mAh of battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.