Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-11-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than the Google Pixel XL, getting a score of 83.8 against 81.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's design is a lot newer and a bit thinner than the Google Pixel XL's, although it is also way heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and the Google Pixel XL have really similar displays, because although the Google Pixel XL has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. The Google Pixel XL features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.