Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-11-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's global score of 83.8. Galaxy A32's design is a lot newer and a little bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a better screen pixels density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A32 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.