Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Green | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 83.8 against 77.8. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is way older and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of display, a way brighter screen, a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a much bigger sensor, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much better video definition and a camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.