Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is a way older, a little bit heavier and much thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, lower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.