Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 389 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, with a 91.8 score against 88.9. Galaxy A71 5G is a a lot lighter and much thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a better 2088 x 2250 resolution and a larger display. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos or videos in low light environments, a way worse 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a way tinier back camera sensor offering a lot lower image quality and a worse (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.