Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is better than Xperia XZ2, getting an 88.9 score against 79.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha design is newer and just a bit thinner than Xperia XZ2's, although it's heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a much smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xperia XZ2 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back camera, a way smaller sensor giving a lot worse image quality, a lower video resolution and a tinier aperture. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.