Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's global score of 80.3. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is notably heavier than the Google Nexus 6P, it's notably thinner and noticeably newer. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a higher 2224 x 2488 resolution and a really bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Nexus 6P counts with a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 48 percent larger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a bigger camera aperture, a back facing camera with way more MP and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.