Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's overall score of 84.3. Galaxy Note9 is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Samsung made it lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a brighter display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 2224 x 2488. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.