Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, with a overall score of 84.3 against 79.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is extremely newer and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is extremely heavier. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a little lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better 2224 x 2488 resolution and a way bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 70% greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera, a much higher video quality, a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations and a much bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.