Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-04-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, with a general score of 84.5 against 79.8. The iPhone XS Max is a noticeably lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, but they are 0.3inches thick. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XS Max has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a lot more opaque screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a slightly better camera than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a lot better 108 MP resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.