Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 11.18 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Ceramic | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2480 x 1860 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 388 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 80.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, getting an 81.6 score against 79.8. The Google Pixel 2 body is lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1860 x 2480 and a way larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 86% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.