Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, having an 81.3 score against 80.6. The Google Pixel XL is an way older phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and Google Pixel XL have quite similar screens, because although the Google Pixel XL has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
Google Pixel XL counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.