Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a score of 80.6 against 76.4. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it is also heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixel density. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has better 30 fps video frame rates, a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.