Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.09 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 83.7 score against 77.8. Xiaomi Mi Note 10's design is just a little lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen, a bigger screen, a really brighter display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a bit better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.