Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting a score of 81.2 against 76. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Motorola Edge 50 body is notably newer, but just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a bigger display. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.