Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a score of 85 against 75.3. IPhone 8 is a a little lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although both were released only a few months apart. IPhone 8 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less brightness, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a larger display. The iPhone 8 takes clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, a camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 8 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The iPhone 8 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 92 percent greater battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 8 is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.