Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with an 80.3 score against 75.3. Google Nexus 6P is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but Google made it a little thinner anyway. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch of display, a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 and the Google Nexus 6P have similar storage for games and applications, they have equal 128 GB internal storage.
Google Nexus 6P captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a more megapixels camera.
Google Nexus 6P's battery duration is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 one, although the Google Nexus 6P has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Note 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.