Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 overall score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is notably newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it is thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit superior processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a back facing camera with way more MP and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.