Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having a overall score of 84.7 against 75.3. The Galaxy A32 construction is extremely newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, but it's thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 comes with Android 8.1 Oreo operating system.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.