Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with an 82.3 score against 75.3. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A60 design is newer, but a little thicker and a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a just a bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A60 features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as Xiaomi Mi Note 3, both have the same internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A60 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a back camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.