Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having a 90.5 score against 75.3. Galaxy A90 5G's body is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, although it's way heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo operating system.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A90 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.