Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 global score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a lot heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's extremely thinner and way newer.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a just a bit higher display pixel density, a really larger display, a way brighter display and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images in low-light environments, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 63 percent larger battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.