Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with a 78.8 score against 75.3. Vivo X60 Pro is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but both of them have the same thickness. These devices have Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features just a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Vivo X60 Pro features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.