Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-15 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, having a global score of 87.1 against 75.3. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note9, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.