Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| -- | 2012-05-03 |
| 4.96 x 2.44 x 0.40 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Krait (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (90 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.47 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.9 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III has a score of 69.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi-Two's 63.7 global score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III has a more recent 4.3 version while Xiaomi Mi-Two has Android 4.1 version, so it offers a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy S III construction is thinner and a little lighter than the Xiaomi Mi-Two.
The Galaxy S III counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi-Two, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S III also counts with a faster graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S III has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi-Two, because although it has a little inferior pixels count per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1280 x 720px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S III also counts with a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S III counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-Two, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S III also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 64 GB. The Xiaomi Mi-Two and the Samsung Galaxy S III both count with very similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy S III has a much tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, a back-facing camera with an 8 megapixels resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy S III features a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi-Two, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S III not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.