Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-07-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2912 x 1224 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 458 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4780mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mix Flip, with an 84.7 score against 83.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Xiaomi Mix Flip works with Android 14 operating system. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 is a better phone than the Xiaomi Mix Flip, it must be noted that it is also a incredibly older, a bit heavier and thicker phone.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mix Flip, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mix Flip counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1224 x 2912 pixels.
Xiaomi Mix Flip takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a higher resolution back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Xiaomi Mix Flip features a slightly better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mix Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4780mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.