Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 80.5 against 77.8. Although the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is a lot older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display and a quite better screen density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos, a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.