Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50, with an 87.9 score against 81.2. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Motorola Edge 50, it must be told that it's also a older, somewhat thicker and heavier device.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has way more brightness, a quite better 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a little better screen pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images in low light situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.