Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's 84.7 score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with Android 10 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32, and both were released with only a few months difference.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a higher display pixel density, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A32 features a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.