Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A60, with an 87.9 score against 82.3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A60, although it is thicker and notably heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A60. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy A60 and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro both count with very similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.