Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, with a 91.8 score against 87.9. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy A71 5G's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, although they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a display with the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot better video definition.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.