Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M30s's 83.3 score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy M30s, but both are 0.35inches thick. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher video quality and a way more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy M30s has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.