Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design has the same weight than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is notably thicker. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a way brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.