Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-09 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 524 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1400 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's 79.5 general score. Although iPhone XS Max is a lot older and just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, it's body is still somewhat thinner. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone XS Max, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a bit bigger display, a just a bit better display pixel density and much more brightness.
The iPhone XS Max has a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a much lower resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 62 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.