Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 general score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 is noticeably older than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's processor, both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.