Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-14 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a overall score of 82.3 against 78.7. The Galaxy A60 construction is lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even though it was released only 13 months before. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A60 has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display density.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 47% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.