Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 78.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a a little bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. The Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in low light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.