Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is an extremely older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a little higher count of pixels per display inch and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light environments, a back-facing camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.