Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 general score. The Google Pixel 2 construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch of display. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back camera with much more MP and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 2 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.